Is it true that it “wasn’t written by witnesses and includes words added by unknown scribes to inject Church orthodoxy . After all, the Bible claims to have been inspired by God and written by eyewitnesses, and evangelical scholars (among others) believe that the biblical books have been carefully preserved and handed down through the centuries. First, to speak of “the Bible” is to speak of a sacred book that is itself a collection of clearly defined sacred books, whether in the original languages or in translation, and the very term “the Bible,” derived from the Greek , “the books,” wasn’t coined until approximately 223 A. And what we are reading today – in English translation or in the original languages – is extraordinarily close (and, for the most part) identical to what these early believers would have been reading when the term was coined.Yet if , “No television preacher has ever read the Bible. Second, we are not reading “a translation of translations of translations of hand-copied copies of copies of copies of copies, and on and on, hundreds of times.” As Professor Daniel Wallace, one of the world’s foremost authorities on ancient New Testament manuscripts, rightly noted, “This is rhetorical flair run amok so badly that it gives hyperbole a bad name. I also love things involving foreign languages and travel, and have a heart for missions. I al Columbia Pennsylvania Shalomb Yeshua 42 Woman Seeking Men I am currently in the United States Army as a 11B Infantryman.
Then we spend the rest of the time wrestling with how to live out those sacred teachings.
And because we believe the Bible is God’s Word, our scholars give special attention to mastering the original languages of the Bible, working to produce the very best possible translations.
It has been 15 years since my last relationship ended.
As I am able, I celebrate the Biblical Festivals such as Hanukkah, and enjoy learning Hebr Hi there.
We are not helped by the emotionally-charged, broad-brushed accusation that, “They are God’s frauds, cafeteria Christians who pick and choose which Bible verses they heed with less care than they exercise in selecting side orders for lunch.
They are joined by religious rationalizers—fundamentalists who, unable to find Scripture supporting their biases and beliefs, twist phrases and modify translations to prove they are honoring the Bible’s words.”Ironically, later in the article, engages in the very kind of biased judgment that Jesus condemned.
There is certainly a tremendous amount of biblical illiteracy in evangelical Christian circles today, and some of it has trickled down from TV preachers and pastors whose sermons seem more like motivational pep talks than serious expositions of the Scriptures. Second, appears to be attacking the Bible itself – although claiming not to – and it does so in a slipshod, methodologically flawed way at that. The article begins with the word “They,” but we are not told who “they” are.
And there is no shortage of hypocrisy in our midst – I speak as an evangelical leader – as we often major on a few specific sins of others while ignoring many sins of our own. Is it those who “wave their Bibles at passersby, screaming their condemnations of homosexuals”?
All this, however, is secondary to the real issue, which is, Can we trust the Bible? ” Is it accurate to say that “the Bible can’t stop debunking itself”? At best, we’ve all read a bad translation—a translation of translations of translations of hand-copied copies of copies of copies of copies, and on and on, hundreds of times.”This statement is patently false, not to mention self-contradictory in the context of the article, since had already referred to “the Bible” 8 times before this paragraph, and throughout the article, reference is made to alleged discrepancies in “the Bible” and of alleged evangelical misuse of “the Bible.” Yet here it is stated that none of us have actually read “the Bible.”Let’s unpack this carefully, since a number of foundational propositions are laid out here.